For every new law that limits my liberty, my freedom of action and eventually my freedom of free thought, I take refuge in the idea that all the time in a global world there is a place , a place, a nation where all of them still exist, and indeed, are amplified. It 's a little bit the idea that there is a universal preservation of freedom, any restriction on the one hand there is an area of \u200b\u200bliberalization on the other. In this melting pot idea me being a citizen of the world, forgetting my nationality. If there is a right that I enjoy, I go to the place where this right is recognized. But then I look around. And I wonder if it is right to conquer the land rights to mobility, migration. I wonder what shall leave to my daughters. I wonder if the Constitution has a value and see if all the emigration of their rights as I see it. And I fear it is not. Maybe, but just maybe, the conservative model of freedom is not the correct one. Perhaps we should also have freedom in their country in its region in its city, in their neighborhood, in our own building. Bring back, slowly, the centrality of the individual and not the state. All together. The road is to each of us find it.
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Roger Barrett - Pink Floyd
ratings?
I'll Remember 6:30 7 less makes me less surprised. I am a university professor for many years. The ratings go from 18 to 30. Then there's 30 honors. There are 14 votes, including Lodi. And I always gave all the votes available, all. On 29, for example, seems to me better than a 28, it seems trivial, but it is not for everyone, some teachers do not consider some votes. Why? If the ratings go from 0 to 10 are all open. Clear that restricting the range between 4 and 8, or even worse, between 5 and 7, leads a flattening in the reviews with intermediate values \u200b\u200bunpronounceable, and especially questionable in its ability to be selected. Giving a vote is the final effect of a process of assessment, where in an impersonal way you try to understand what a student has learned, not who he is, not what you think. No matter if you agree or disagree with the student, the matter understanding, the theory, espenrienze. Separate is not easy, but it is indeed the basis of the evaluation process. Now, what are the fees for giving votes to conduct a behavior? A firm and quiet is good and worth 10? Or a still and quiet and lazy and deserves 4? An agitated generates noise and deserves 6? Or a troubled soul discussion and is worth 8?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)