I'll Remember 6:30 7 less makes me less surprised. I am a university professor for many years. The ratings go from 18 to 30. Then there's 30 honors. There are 14 votes, including Lodi. And I always gave all the votes available, all. On 29, for example, seems to me better than a 28, it seems trivial, but it is not for everyone, some teachers do not consider some votes. Why? If the ratings go from 0 to 10 are all open. Clear that restricting the range between 4 and 8, or even worse, between 5 and 7, leads a flattening in the reviews with intermediate values \u200b\u200bunpronounceable, and especially questionable in its ability to be selected. Giving a vote is the final effect of a process of assessment, where in an impersonal way you try to understand what a student has learned, not who he is, not what you think. No matter if you agree or disagree with the student, the matter understanding, the theory, espenrienze. Separate is not easy, but it is indeed the basis of the evaluation process. Now, what are the fees for giving votes to conduct a behavior? A firm and quiet is good and worth 10? Or a still and quiet and lazy and deserves 4? An agitated generates noise and deserves 6? Or a troubled soul discussion and is worth 8?
0 comments:
Post a Comment